Jetbrains annotations code#

You can modify the namespace where these attributes are located. Them into RS to perform other validations of my invention? If so, does Q: Does this mean I could create some annotations of my own and link New source file (2 above) before I can use the items it contains.

Jetbrains annotations code#

Q: I must copy the code from the code annotation option and create a If I delete the new class (2 above) from my solution, the

Tooltip message 'Possibly null assignment to entity marked with RS highlights the return null statement with a blue squiggly and a I added a new class to my solution and pasted the code from 1 intoģ. I copied the JetBrains.Annnotations to the clipboard.Ģ. I do not know if these attributes are documented anywhere.ġ. Throw new ArgumentNullException(argumentName) This is an assertion method that asserts that a parameter is not null. Here is an example that use some of the attributes: Wellknown attributes: StringFormatMethod, InvokerParameterName, AssertionMethod,ĪssertionCondition, TerminatesProgram, CanBeNull, NotNull, CannotApplyEqualityĪnd BaseTypeRequired. If you define your own, you can change the namespace, but keep (just like you have done) or you reference the Īssembly. Q1) Yes - you need the Attribute definitions. The only way is to mock an external annotations XML file. Manually editing annotations for some other compiled R#4 is focused onĪnnotating own code and provides some pre-built annotations of. > 'telling' R# about MbUnit's Assert methods as I simply couldn't > Annotations has become vastly more difficult. > I love R# 4, but I must say that the configuration of Code The way to enable Code Annotations in a project would simply be:Ģ) Open Resharper Options / Code Annotationsģ) Click a button named something like 'Create Code Annotations Attributes'.Ĥ) Resharper asks for a namespace which the user supplies.ĥ) Resharper creates the file and adds it the the solution.Ĭould even be implemented using File Templates.

The attributes in the solution automatically. It's a brilliant solution, I'm sure, but I can't quite see what theĪctually Ole and I were wondering, if Resharper could create a file containing The eye and cause me to ask myself 'how did I ever live without it?' Perhaps I don't move around c# to the extent where it would poke me in Knock-out punch that would convince me to use more of the rest of it. Say, I appreciate the string.format usage but I can't really see the Solution actually give you? What value does it add to a solution. The bit I can't quiteĪppreciate is what exactly does including the clipboard text in your That has helped me immensely in the past. Reading through it, I canĪppreciate the additional parsing that RS does on string.format as This is a very common error, and you usually only find it at runtime. Probably get a 'Object is not set to an instance of an object' exception If for some reason GetValue returns null, you will With CanBeNull, but the text parameter in PrintValue cannot be null as it Resharper will highlight the text parameter in PrintValue() call as a possible Let me give you an example of what I think is cool: Do I read that as implying you could add others? I think I'm closer to understanding more what code annotations can do but there's obviously more to it than the little I've unravelled. What puzzles me, is that the namespaces display area is awfully large given that it only has one namespace listed. If I disable JetBrains.Annotations in RS -> Options -> Code Inspection -> Code Annotations and then bounce my solution, I lose the string.format syntax checking. Perhaps I don't move around enough in c# to the extent where it would poke me in the eye and cause me to ask myself 'how did I ever live without it?' It's a brilliant solution, I'm sure, but I can't quite see what the problem is that it solves. The bit I can't quite appreciate is what exactly does including the clipboard text in your solution actually give you? What value does it add to a solution? As I say, I appreciate the string.format usage but I can't really see the knock-out punch that would convince me to make more use of the rest of it. Reading through the link, I can appreciate the additional parsing that RS does on string.format as that has helped me immensely in the past. I have come to rely on value analysis but I can't quite see the relevance of code annotations.